lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 Resend 00/34] CPUFreq Cleanup Part III
    From
    On 25 October 2013 18:26, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
    > Having considered that a bit I think that I'd prefer one patch doing all of
    > these changes in one go (and with all applicable ACKs collected), one of the
    > reasons being that if it is necessary to revert that stuff, whatever the
    > reason, it will be much easier to do that with just one commit than with
    > 34 of them.

    With a similar reason I think the probability is more that a revert might
    be required for individual drivers as they may need to switch back to
    ->target() instead of ->target_index() and so keeping them separate
    might be better.

    In case we need to revert all patches due to some breakage, we can
    always do that in a single commit if required.

    What do you say?


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-10-25 16:21    [W:4.739 / U:0.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site