Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Oct 2013 03:48:01 +0100 | Subject | Re: [Suggestion] arc: compiler: bug: about an arc compiler's bug which is not in gcc main source code. | From | Joern Rennecke <> |
| |
On 23 October 2013 03:00, Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> wrote:
> Binutils (1 issue, ld and as information): > > when calling panic(), printk(), or memset() with R_ARC_S21W_PCREL, it may be overflow (I guess it need be R_ARC_S25W_PCREL). > > /usr/local/bin/arc-elf32-ld --build-id -X -o .tmp_vmlinux1 -T /android/public-kernel/linux-next/arch/arc/kernel/vmlinux.lds arch/arc/kernel/head.o init/built-in.o --start-group usr/built-in.o arch/arc/built-in.o arch/arc/boot/dts/built-in.o arch/arc/plat-arcfpga/built-in.o arch/arc/plat-tb10x/built-in.o kernel/built-in.o mm/built-in.o fs/built-in.o ipc/built-in.o security/built-in.o crypto/built-in.o block/built-in.o lib/lib.a arch/arc/lib/lib.a /usr/local/lib/gcc/arc-elf32/4.8.0/libgcc.a lib/built-in.o arch/arc/lib/built-in.o /usr/local/lib/gcc/arc-elf32/4.8.0/libgcc.a drivers/built-in.o sound/built-in.o firmware/built-in.o net/built-in.o --end-group > /usr/local/bin/arc-elf32-ld: Error: Overflow detected in relocation value; > /usr/local/bin/arc-elf32-ld: Relocation value should be between 1048575 and -1048576 whereas it 2404264 > /usr/local/bin/arc-elf32-ld: Global symbol: "panic". > /usr/local/bin/arc-elf32-ld: > Relocation type is:R_ARC_S21W_PCREL > FileName:arch/arc/built-in.o > Section Name:.text > Offset in Section:1716 > /usr/local/bin/arc-elf32-ld: final link failed: Bad value > make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
That just means that the image is too large to allow conditional pc-relative calls (tail/sibcalls) or otherwise.
You can avoid generating them for functions with out a relevant attribute with -mmedium-calls .
> GCC (2 issues, and gcc information): > > CC drivers/rtc/systohc.o > drivers/rtc/systohc.c: In function 'rtc_set_ntp_time': > drivers/rtc/systohc.c:44:1: internal compiler error: in arc_ifcvt, at config/arc/arc.c:8315 > } > ^ > 0x939c94 arc_ifcvt > ../../gcc/gcc/config/arc/arc.c:8315 > 0x93a394 arc_reorg > ../../gcc/gcc/config/arc/arc.c:5985 > 0x7517d9 rest_of_handle_machine_reorg > ../../gcc/gcc/reorg.c:3927 > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. > See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. > make[2]: *** [drivers/rtc/systohc.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [drivers/rtc] Error 2 > make: *** [drivers] Error 2 > > > CC [M] drivers/target/target_core_pr.o > drivers/target/target_core_pr.c: In function 'target_scsi3_emulate_pr_in': > drivers/target/target_core_pr.c:4033:1: error: unrecognizable insn: > } > ^ > (insn 846 194 196 12 (set (reg:QI 1 r1) > (subreg:QI (mem/j/c:DI (plus:SI (reg/v/f:SI 2 r2 [orig:199 pr_reg ] [199]) > (const_int 576 [0x240])) [0 pr_reg_50->pr_res_key+0 S8 A32]) 7)) drivers/target/target_core_pr.c:3677 -1 > (nil)) > drivers/target/target_core_pr.c:4033:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2151 > 0x758fb5 _fatal_insn(char const*, rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char const*) > ../../gcc/gcc/rtl-error.c:109 > 0x758fe9 _fatal_insn_not_found(rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char const*) > ../../gcc/gcc/rtl-error.c:117 > 0x726e83 extract_insn(rtx_def*) > ../../gcc/gcc/recog.c:2151 > 0x726ef4 extract_insn_cached(rtx_def*) > ../../gcc/gcc/recog.c:2054 > 0x5fe026 cleanup_subreg_operands(rtx_def*) > ../../gcc/gcc/final.c:3305 > 0x750c2e reload(rtx_def*, int) > ../../gcc/gcc/reload1.c:1240 > 0x68e703 do_reload > ../../gcc/gcc/ira.c:4631 > 0x68e703 rest_of_handle_reload > ../../gcc/gcc/ira.c:4731 > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. > See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. > make[2]: *** [drivers/target/target_core_pr.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [drivers/target] Error 2 > make: *** [drivers] Error 2
Can these issues be reproduced with the lastest gcc version? If so, can you provide preprocessed source of the testcases and the compiler flags to trigger the ICEs?
| |