lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/23 v2] cleanup: introduce br/netdev/netif/wiphy_<foo>_ratelimited() and use them to simplify code
On 10/18 12:11, Joe Perches wrote:
> (resending to lists only because of multiple X's in the subject line)
>
> On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 11:52 +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> v1-v2:
>>
>> Introduce macro br/netdev/netif/wiphy_XXX_ratelimited() according
>> to Joe Perches's advice. The macros are similar to net_XXX_ratelimited()
>> which is more clarifying than net_ratelimited_function(), then use them
>> to simplify code.
>
> There are some conceptual differences between these
> implementations and other <foo>_ratelimited uses.
>
> For every other subsystem but net, there is a per-location
> struct ratelimit_state.

yes, but I think I just changed net subsystem. Macro DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE used
DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL and DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST, so what do you think?
Could anyone give me some advises ?

> Here you've made the global net_ratelimit_state replace all
> of these individual structs so there is some new interaction.
>
> Dunno if that's good or bad.
>
>
>
>
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-21 13:41    [W:0.029 / U:3.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site