lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: test if the gpio can sleep
On 10.10.2013 10:46, ext Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 10:39 AM, Ionut Nicu wrote:
>> Some gpio chips may have get/set operations that
>> can sleep. For this type of chips we must use the
>> _cansleep() version of gpio_set_value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu <ioan.nicu.ext@nsn.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 11 ++++++++---
>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
>> index a764da7..b5f17ef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
>> @@ -27,11 +27,16 @@ struct gpiomux {
>>
>> static void i2c_mux_gpio_set(const struct gpiomux *mux, unsigned val)
>> {
>> + unsigned gpio;
>> int i;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < mux->data.n_gpios; i++)
>> - gpio_set_value(mux->gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i],
>> - val & (1 << i));
>> + for (i = 0; i < mux->data.n_gpios; i++) {
>> + gpio = mux->gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i];
>> + if (gpio_cansleep(gpio))
>> + gpio_set_value_cansleep(gpio, val & (1 << i));
>> + else
>> + gpio_set_value(gpio, val & (1 << i));
>
> The proper way to do this is just always use the _cansleep() version.
> gpio_set_value() only works for chips which do not sleep,
> gpio_set_value_cansleep() works for both those who do sleep and those who do
> not.
>

Ok, then I will re-work the patch to do just that. Thanks!



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-10 11:21    [W:0.047 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site