Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:02:37 +0800 | From | annie li <> | Subject | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/grant-table: correctly initialize grant table version 1 |
| |
On 2013-1-9 20:02, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 02:40 +0000, ANNIE LI wrote: > >>> @@ -1080,18 +1081,18 @@ static void gnttab_request_version(void) >>> panic("we need grant tables version 2, but only version 1 is available"); >>> } else { >>> grant_table_version = 1; >>> + grefs_per_grant_frame = PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct grant_entry_v1); >>> gnttab_interface =&gnttab_v1_ops; >>> } >>> - printk(KERN_INFO "Grant tables using version %d layout.\n", >>> - grant_table_version); >>> } >>> >>> >> Is it better to keep printk here? In your last patch, you removed it >> because gnttab_request_version and gnttab_resume are all called in >> gnttab_init. and gnttab_resume also contains calling of >> gnttab_request_version. But in this patch, gnttab_setup is used, and >> does not have this issue now. >> > > Yes, I think we want to print this at both start of day and resume? > Right. > Either by adding a print to gnttab_resume() Only adding a print into gnttab_resume() would miss this print at start of day. In gnttab_init, gnttab_request_version and gnttab_setup are called, not gnttab_resume. > or by keeping the existing > one here in preference to moving it to gnttab_setup(). I'd prefer the > latter to avoid the duplication, unless I'm mistaken and request_version > is called in more than those two locations. > Yes, I'd like the latter. Request_version is only called in those two locations.
Thanks Annie > Ian. > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel >
|  |