Messages in this thread |  | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 06/13] cpuset: cleanup cpuset[_can]_attach() | Date | Mon, 07 Jan 2013 09:58:22 +1030 |
| |
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> writes:
> Hello, Rusty. > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:17:11AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >> > So, I guess this currently is caught in a place which isn't here or >> > there. I'm pretty skeptical whether it makes sense to bother about >> > static usages tho. Can I keep them for static ones? >> >> I didn't realize that cpuset_attach was a fastpath. If it is, put a > > It isn't a hot path. It's just a bit nasty to have to allocate them > separately. > >> static there and I'll fix turn it into a bitmap when I need to. >> Otherwise, please don't change the code in the first place. > > So, the plan to drop cpumask_t is still on? If so, I'll leave > cpumask_var_t.
Yep!
Thanks, Rusty.
|  |