[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fb: Rework locking to fix lock ordering on takeover
Am 05.01.2013 13:07, schrieb Alan Cox:
>> So to add such an "I am crap" flag my idea would be to add an
>> .fb_handle_damage to struct fb_ops and then call that (if exists)
>> whenever something was changed.
> I was thinking much higher level - ie at the printk kind of level
>> My patch (for udlfb) follows as an reply to this message. If that patch
>> is ok, it should be applied to smscufx too (I would make it). In regard
>> to udl I don't know, I haven't had a deeper look at it nor used it up to
>> now.
> Looks pretty clean as a solution to me.

Thanks and sorry for the two empty lines in the patch. I swear I had a
look at the patch before sending it out, but haven't seen them.

So should I make the same patch for smscufx and while beeing there,
send out at v2 without those 2 empty lines?



 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-05 13:41    [W:0.048 / U:5.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site