lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [UPDATE][PATCH 4/4] GPU/i915: Fix acpi_bus_get_device() check in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
2013/02/01 9:53, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> 2013/02/01 9:50, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>> 2013/01/31 19:03, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:27:26PM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>>>> I forgot to change subject. So I resend a patch.
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> acpi_bus_get_device() returns int not acpi_status.
>>>>
>>>> The patch change not to apply ACPI_FAILURE() to the return value of
>>>> acpi_bus_get_device().
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>>
>>> I've tried to apply this to drm-intel-next-queued, but git am didn't
>>> really like your patch - it failed to apply. Can you please rebase to the
>>> drm-intel-next-queued branch from
>>>
>>> git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel
>>>
>>> and please resubmit the patch, preferrably formatted with git
>>> format-patch?
>>
>> My mailer added a space in the patch. I updated the patch.
>> How abot it?
>>
>> ---
>> acpi_bus_get_device() returns int not acpi_status.
>>
>> The patch change not to apply ACPI_FAILURE() to the return value of
>> acpi_bus_get_device().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
>> index 7741c22..4d33874 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
>> @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static void intel_didl_outputs(struct drm_device *dev)
>> int i = 0;
>>
>> handle = DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->pdev->dev);
>> - if (!handle || ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev)))
>> + if (!handle || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev))
>> return;
>>
>> if (acpi_is_video_device(acpi_dev))
>>
>
> Oops. My mailer added a space again...
> I'll check my mailer again.

I do not understand why space was added to the patch.
So I attached the patch. Please check it.

Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu

>
> Thanks,
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

acpi_bus_get_device() returns int not acpi_status.

The patch change not to apply ACPI_FAILURE() to the return value of
acpi_bus_get_device().

Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
index 7741c22..4d33874 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static void intel_didl_outputs(struct drm_device *dev)
int i = 0;

handle = DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->pdev->dev);
- if (!handle || ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev)))
+ if (!handle || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev))
return;

if (acpi_is_video_device(acpi_dev))
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-02-01 02:21    [W:0.052 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site