Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: governors: Remove code redundancy between governors | Date | Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:23:54 +0100 |
| |
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 07:50:04 PM Fabio Baltieri wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:58:02PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > With the inclusion of following patches: > > > > 9f4eb10 cpufreq: conservative: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary > > 772b4b1 cpufreq: ondemand: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary > > > > code redundancy is introduced again. Get rid of it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > > --- > > Hi, > > Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
OK
Fabio, Viresh, Shawn,
This time I was *really* confused as to what patches I was supposed to take, from whom and in what order, so I applied a number of them in the order given by patchwork. That worked well enough, because (almost) all of them applied for me without conflicts. That said I would appreciate it if you could look into the bleeding-edge branch of my tree and see if there's anything missing or something that shouldn't be there (cpufreq-wise).
Thanks, Rafael
-- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
| |