lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] e1000e: fix resuming from runtime-suspend
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:32:14 AM Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Monday, January 28, 2013 04:05:33 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>> [+cc Rafael, author of patch you cited]
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
>>>> <khlebnikov@openvz.org> wrote:
>>>>> Bug was introduced in commit 23606cf5d1192c2b17912cb2ef6e62f9b11de133
>>>>> ("e1000e / PCI / PM: Add basic runtime PM support (rev. 4)") in v2.6.35
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@openvz.org>
>>>>> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> Cc: Jeff Kirsher<jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: Bruce Allan<bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
>>>>> index fbf75fd..2853c11 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
>>>>> @@ -5691,14 +5691,17 @@ static int e1000_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>>> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>>>>> struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>>> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>>>> + int retval;
>>>>> + bool wake;
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) {
>>>>> - bool wake;
>>>>> + if (!e1000e_pm_ready(adapter))
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> - __e1000_shutdown(pdev,&wake, true);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> + retval = __e1000_shutdown(pdev,&wake, true);
>>>>> + if (!retval)
>>>>> + e1000_power_off(pdev, true, wake);
>>>>>
>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>> + return retval;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static int e1000_idle(struct device *dev)
>>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd like the changelog to say what the bug is and how it is being fixed in
>>> general terms.
>>
>> Ok, my bad.
>>
>> Problem: ethernet device does not work (no carrier signal).
>> Right after boot it goes to runtime-suspend and never wake up.
>>
>> Original code (before your commit) calls pci_prepare_to_sleep() and it
>> calls pci_enable_wake() and switches device to one of D3 state.
>
> The original code in what function?

Oh, I screwed up again. That commit adds support of runtime-pm,
so there is no original code. But runtime-pm in 'igb' works in this way:
igb_runtime_suspend() -> pci_prepare_to_sleep() -> pci_enable_wake()

>
>> It seems redundant, because pci_pm_runtime_suspend() do the same thing
>> after calling ->runtime_suspend callback. Or rather it did it before commit
>> 42eca2302146fed51335b95128e949ee6f54478f ("PCI: Don't touch card regs after
>> runtime suspend D3") and third patch aimed fix this damage.
>>
>> More over seems like calling pci_enable_wake() from e1000e isn't enough for my case,
>> because my enthernet cannot wakeup from runtime-suspend without third patch.
>
> Which third patch?

third patch in this patchset:
"[PATCH 3/5] PCI: revert preparing for wakeup in runtime-suspend finalization"

>
>> Seems like it's because pci_enable_wake() and pci_finish_runtime_suspend()
>> calls different pratform-pm callbacks -- platform_pci_run_wake() /
>> platform_pci_sleep_wake().
>
> That's correct, for historical reasons. We'll need to merge these things, but
> for now the are separate (because of the way ACPI handles system suspend and
> runtime PM).

Ok, I have not read yet all code and documentation. But it seems runtime-pm
engine needs some sort of runtime debug-mode which would warn about strange or
ineffective actions in drivers, probably just script for parsing kernel-log
and tracking states for all devices and buses.

>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-31 08:42    [W:0.163 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site