lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 1/4] video: panel: add CLAA101WA01A panel support
On 01/30/2013 03:48 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 04:27:11PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
>> On 01/30/2013 04:20 PM, Mark Zhang wrote:
> [...]
>>>> +static int panel_claa101_get_modes(struct display_entity *entity,
>>>> + const struct videomode **modes)
>>>> +{
>>>> + /* TODO get modes from EDID? */
>>>
>>> Why not move the "nvidia,ddc" from encoder's DT to panel's DT? In that
>>> case, you can get EDID here. I know drm has some helpers to fetch EDID
>>> but I recall there are some other functions which has no drm
>>> dependencies which may be suitable for you.
>>
>> I explained this in the cover letter - I'm not sure we want to have
>> a dependency on DRM here, as CDF entities could also be connected to
>> other subsystems. That's something we need to figure out. But yes,
>> ultimately this should be the place where EDID is retrieved.
>
> I already said this in another thread. I think we should only be using
> the CDF .get_modes() for static modes that cannot be obtained from EDID.
> Thinking about it, I'm not quite sure why EDID would be needed for this
> kind of panel anyway. Ventana probably has it because it keeps us from
> having to hardcode things, but if we provide drivers for the panel
> anyway, we can just as well hard-code the supported mode(s) in those
> drivers.

I don't think so. I think it's better that we only have one entry for
getting video modes. Since CDF already provides ".get_modes" for us, we
can rely on that. And according to my understanding, get video modes in
panel driver makes sense than getting it in crtc.

In this way, panel driver may get video modes from EDID or from
hard-coded display timing infos, but other modules such as crtc don't
need to care about that.

Mark
>
> What I'm trying to say is that the existence of EDID is board-specific,
> so boards other than Ventana may not have an EDID EEPROM. Or perhaps
> this particular display has the EEPROM integrated? Even in that case,
> some boards may use this panel and simply not connect the EEPROM to an
> I2C controller.
>
> Thierry
>
> * Unknown Key
> * 0x7F3EB3A1
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-30 10:01    [W:0.080 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site