lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ptp: PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH depends on x86
From
Date
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 20:02 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:31:01PM -0500, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> > The EG20T PCH is only compatible with Intel Atom processors so it
> > should depend on x86.
>
> Yes, there is something wrong with PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH. The last
> several times I did 'make oldconfig' for various configs, it asked me
> whether to enable this 'new' option. That is really annoying,
> especially with non-atom and non-x86 builds.
>
> Ben, you removed the PCH_GBE dependency in 18d359ce. Are you sure that
> was the right thing to do?

The clock is a separate device and the PHC driver doesn't depend on the
net driver. However, since the clock is a PCI device the driver does
need a dependency on PCI (which was previously an indirect dependency).

> > Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/ptp/Kconfig | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > --- a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ config DP83640_PHY
> >
> > config PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH
> > tristate "Intel PCH EG20T as PTP clock"
> > + depends on X86
> > select PTP_1588_CLOCK
> > help
> > This driver adds support for using the PCH EG20T as a PTP

I agree that the driver is only useful on X86, but some people like to
build-test as many drivers as possible with a single configuration. The
only build dependency for this seems to be PCI.

(Putting on my distribution hat for a moment: it is useful to know that
a driver is practically architecture-specific even though it can be
built elsewhere. Perhaps there is a use for a BUILD_TEST or BUILD_ALL
config symbol, so this could be:
depends on X86 || (BUILD_TEST && PCI)
)

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-30 21:02    [W:1.405 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site