lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 1/2] KSM: numa awareness sysfs knob
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013, Simon Jeons wrote:
>
> Hi Petr and Hugh,
>
> One offline question, thanks for your clarify.

Perhaps not as offline as you intended :)

>
> How to understand age = (unsigned char)(ksm_scan.seqnr -
> rmap_item->address);? It used for what?

As you can see, remove_rmap_item_from_tree uses it to decide whether
or not it should rb_erase the rmap_item from the unstable_tree.

Every full scan of all the rmap_items, we increment ksm_scan.seqnr,
forget the old unstable_tree (it would just be a waste of processing
to remove every node one by one), and build up the unstable_tree afresh.

That works fine until we need to remove an rmap_item: then we have to be
very sure to remove it from the unstable_tree if it's already been linked
there during this scan, but ignore its rblinkage if that's just left over
from the previous scan.

A single bit would be enough to decide this; but we got it troublesomely
wrong in the early days of KSM (didn't always visit every rmap_item each
scan), so it's convenient to use 8 bits (the low unsigned char, stored
below the FLAGs and below the page-aligned address in the rmap_item -
there's lots of them, best keep them as small as we can) and do a
BUG_ON(age > 1) if we made a mistake.

We haven't hit that BUG_ON in over three years: if we need some more
bits for something, we can cut the age down to one or two bits.

Hugh


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-03 07:01    [W:0.100 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site