lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] Secure Boot: More controversial changes
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 06:05:56PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> These at the very least need some kind of CONFIG_WEAK_SECURE_BOOT
> option or something like that.

Given Eric's views on the kexec patch (and given that there's no point
in the hibernate one if kexec's available...), I'm not planning on
pushing these until there's a plausible story for limiting kexec to
signed images.

--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-29 06:42    [W:2.333 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site