Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:45:56 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] perf stat: add interval printing | From | Stephane Eranian <> |
| |
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> wrote: > Em Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:26:17PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu: >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >> <acme@redhat.com> wrote: >> > Em Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 04:21:11PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu: >> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >> >> <acme@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> > Em Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:18:52PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu: >> >> >> This patch adds a new printing mode for perf stat. >> >> >> It allows internval printing. That means perf stat >> >> >> can now print event deltas at regular time interval. >> >> >> This is useful to detect phases in programs. >> >> > >> >> > This patch is not applying to my perf/core branch, does it depend on >> >> > some other outstanding patchset from you? >> >> > >> >> > Tomorrow probably all I had in this area will be in Ingo's tree, but >> >> > can you please take a look at my perf/core branch at: >> >> > >> >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux >> >> > >> >> My patches are always relative to: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip.tip.git >> >> >> >> Do you still need to rebase against your tree? >> > >> > Well, userspace code normally is developed on my tree and eventually >> > goes to the one you mentioned. If you make sure that now, that both are >> > synched after some weeks, then probably it'll work with my tree. >> > >> How's the kernel proper side of your tree sync'd with tip.git? I cannot have >> the kernel patches for one tree and the perf patches for another. That's a >> lot of overhead especially when it comes to testing. > > Normally regularly, right now it seems all is synched. > Ok, will resubmit the series against your tree then.
| |