lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch v4 0/18] sched: simplified fork, release load avg and power awareness scheduling
From
Date
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 16:22 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: 
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:40:46PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > No no, that's not restricted to one node. It's just overloaded because
> > > I turned balancing off at the NODE domain level.
> >
> > Which shows only that I was multitasking, and in a rush. Boy was that
> > dumb. Hohum.
>
> Ok, let's take a step back and slow it down a bit so that people like me
> can understand it: you want to try it with disabled load balancing on
> the node level, AFAICT. But with that many tasks, perf will suck anyway,
> no? Unless you want to benchmark the numa-aware aspect and see whether
> load balancing on the node level feels differently, perf-wise?

The broken thought was, since it's not wakeup path, stop node balance..
but killing all of it killed FORK/EXEC balance, oops.

I think I'm done with this thing though. See mail I just sent. There
are better things to do than letting box jerk my chain endlessly ;-)

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-28 17:21    [W:0.971 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site