Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/12] rcu: Rename n_nocb_gp_requests to need_future_gp | Date | Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:30:01 -0800 |
| |
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
CPUs going idle need to be able to indicate their need for future grace periods. A mechanism for doing this already exists for no-callbacks CPUs, so the idea is to re-use that mechanism. This commit therefore moves the ->n_nocb_gp_requests field of the rcu_node structure out from under the CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU #ifdef and renames it to ->need_future_gp.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- kernel/rcutree.h | 4 ++-- kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 18 +++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h index 96a27f9..034b524 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.h +++ b/kernel/rcutree.h @@ -194,9 +194,9 @@ struct rcu_node { #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU wait_queue_head_t nocb_gp_wq[2]; /* Place for rcu_nocb_kthread() to wait GP. */ - int n_nocb_gp_requests[2]; - /* Counts of upcoming no-CB GP requests. */ #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */ + int need_future_gp[2]; + /* Counts of upcoming no-CB GP requests. */ raw_spinlock_t fqslock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp; } ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp; diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h index 7a66312..9647a6b 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h @@ -2064,7 +2064,7 @@ static int rcu_nocb_needs_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp) { struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp); - return rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[(ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->completed) + 1) & 0x1]; + return rnp->need_future_gp[(ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->completed) + 1) & 0x1]; } /* @@ -2078,8 +2078,8 @@ static int rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp) int needmore; wake_up_all(&rnp->nocb_gp_wq[c & 0x1]); - rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1] = 0; - needmore = rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[(c + 1) & 0x1]; + rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1] = 0; + needmore = rnp->need_future_gp[(c + 1) & 0x1]; trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed, c, rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, needmore ? "CleanupMore" : "Cleanup"); @@ -2087,7 +2087,7 @@ static int rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp) } /* - * Set the root rcu_node structure's ->n_nocb_gp_requests field + * Set the root rcu_node structure's ->need_future_gp field * based on the sum of those of all rcu_node structures. This does * double-count the root rcu_node structure's requests, but this * is necessary to handle the possibility of a rcu_nocb_kthread() @@ -2096,7 +2096,7 @@ static int rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp) */ static void rcu_nocb_gp_set(struct rcu_node *rnp, int nrq) { - rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[(rnp->completed + 1) & 0x1] += nrq; + rnp->need_future_gp[(rnp->completed + 1) & 0x1] += nrq; } static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp) @@ -2227,7 +2227,7 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp) c = rnp->completed + 2; /* Count our request for a grace period. */ - rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1]++; + rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]++; trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed, c, rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, "Startleaf"); @@ -2271,10 +2271,10 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp) * Adjust counters accordingly and start the * needed grace period. */ - rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1]--; + rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]--; c = rnp_root->completed + 1; - rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1]++; - rnp_root->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1]++; + rnp->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]++; + rnp_root->need_future_gp[c & 0x1]++; trace_rcu_future_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed, -- 1.7.8
| |