lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [tip:x86/asm] x86/xor: Make virtualization friendly
On 01/25/2013 02:15 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 02:11 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 01/25/2013 02:43 AM, tip-bot for Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Commit-ID: 05fbf4d6fc6a3c0c3e63b77979c9311596716d10
>>> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/05fbf4d6fc6a3c0c3e63b77979c9311596716d10
>>> Author: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
>>> AuthorDate: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 14:21:23 +0000
>>> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
>>> CommitDate: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:23:51 +0100
>>>
>>> x86/xor: Make virtualization friendly
>>>
>>> In virtualized environments, the CR0.TS management needed here
>>> can be a lot slower than anticipated by the original authors of
>>> this code, which particularly means that in such cases forcing
>>> the use of SSE- (or MMX-) based implementations is not desirable
>>> - actual measurements should always be done in that case.
>>>
>>> For consistency, pull into the shared (32- and 64-bit) header
>>> not only the inclusion of the generic code, but also that of the
>>> AVX variants.
>>>
>>
>> This patch is wrong and should be dropped. I verified it with the KVM
>> people that they do NOT want this change. It is a Xen-specific problem.
>>
>
> FWIW: I have dropped this patch from tip:x86/asm.
>

The bottom line, I guess, is that we need something like
cpu_has_slow_kernel_fpu or something like that, and set it for
specifically affected hypervisors?

Do we know if Hyper-V has performance issues with CR0.TS?

-hpa

--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-26 02:41    [W:0.076 / U:1.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site