lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf: Fix compile warnings in tests/attr.c
Jiri Olsa [jolsa@redhat.com] wrote:
| On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:30:52PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| > From 4d266e5040c33103f5d226b0d16b89f8ef79e3ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
| > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
| > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:14:28 -0800
| > Subject: [PATCH] perf: Fix compile warnings in tests/attr.c
| >
| > Replace '%llu' in printf()s with 'PRIu64' in 'tools/perf/tests/attr.c'
| > to fix compile warnings (which become errors due to -Werror).
|
| i386 and x86_64 compiles fine for me with gcc versions 4.6.3-2 and 4.7.2-2

But is broken on Power for 64bit :-( I am trying to fix that and thought
that use of format specifiers like 'PRIu64' was the way to go.

|
| with your patch for x86_64 I'm getting following warnings/errors:

|
| CC tests/attr.o
| tests/attr.c: In function ‘store_event’:
| tests/attr.c:69:4: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 6 has type ‘__u64’ [-Werror=format]

Here is what I see on an x86_64 box, RHEL6.2 box:

$ rpm -qf /usr/include/linux/types.h
kernel-headers-2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.x86_64

$ cat foo.c
#include <linux/types.h>

$ cc -Werror -Wall foo.c
In file included from /usr/include/asm-generic/types.h:7,
from /usr/include/asm/types.h:6,
from /usr/include/linux/types.h:4,
from foo5.c:1:
/usr/include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h:31:2: error: #error __u64 defined as unsigned long long

where the #error is my debug message.

<snip>

| make: *** [tests/attr.o] Error 1
|
| i386 compiles fine

__u64 is 'unsigned long long' on x86 and PRIu64 is 'llu' which is fine.

__u64 is 'unsigned long' on Power and PRIu64 is 'lu' which is again fine.

But __u64 is 'unsigned long long' on x86_64, but PRIu64 is '%lu' bc __WORDSIZE
is 64.

On x86_64, shouldn't __u64, be defined as 'unsigned long' rather than
'unsigned long long' - ie include 'int-l64.h' rather than 'int-ll64.h' ?

BTW, does 'perf' with my patch compile, (with warnings) for you on x86_64
with 'WERROR=0 make' ?

Sukadev

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-21 23:42    [W:0.067 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site