Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:43:02 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PULL] kms locking rework | From | Sedat Dilek <> |
| |
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I am testing your patchset (original postings at [1]). >> At a 1st look it seems to be OK. >> Any tests you want me to run? > > Imo the fundamentals of the series are well-tested with the i-g-t > series, so running things on as many (non-i915) gpus as possible is > the most interesting thing. I just don't have that many radeon/nouveau > machines lying around for that ... >
I am here on SNB, so.
> If you want to get really fancy, set up a zaphod dual-head config with > 2 independent X servers to check whether concurrent pageflips don't > cause havoc. That needs something which pageflips, ofc.
Sounds like a lot of work... Any docs/wiki around to manage such a setup?
- Sedat -
> -Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
| |