lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf: Verify signature of signed elf binary
From
Date
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 12:36 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:32:45AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> [..]
> > > > At this point, why would you want yet another method for signing files?
> > >
> > > Are you saying that append signature instead of putting them in a section
> > > or are you saying that just use IMA.
> > >
> > > - For the first, I am fine with appending too if that works better. So
> > > what's wrong with current implementation. Just because we append the
> > > signatures in case of modules, we should follow the same thing for
> > > executables too?
> >
> > No, I was saying that if this patch set were to be upstreamed, then the
> > signature verification, at least for ELF modules and ELF executables,
> > should be the same. The patch would then be a lot smaller.
>
> I don't think that patch is lot smaller. Initially I had written code
> where signatures were appended. Parsing the signature is little different
> from module. In case of modules, whole file is already in memory and
> in case of executables, we are reading selected portions of file in
> buffer.

Have you looked at the original kernel module signature verification
code as posted by David? It did something similar, but was not
upstreamed.

thanks,

Mimi



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-20 19:01    [W:0.084 / U:0.728 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site