lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: LIO - the broken iSCSI target implementation
From
Please don't start another "SCST Vs. LIO" holy war here. We all know why LIO belongs to Linux kernel and SCST does not.

On Friday, January 18, 2013 3:54:18 AM UTC+2, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> Andreas Steinmetz, on 01/16/2013 08:19 PM wrote:
>
> > Thus, lio (http://www.linux-iscsi.org/) seemed to be the politically and
>
> > technically favoured solution.
>
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> > The fun part of it was that I finally ended up using SCST - which was
>
> > refrained from kernel inclusion for technical reasons beyond my
>
> > knowledge.
>
>
>
> No, it was purely political. There has never been any technical argument why LIO
>
> is better. And can not be.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vlad
>
>
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-18 23:41    [W:0.226 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site