[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] ELF executable signing and verification
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 06:22:47PM +0200, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote:

> > Currently it is expected to use these patches only for statically linked
> > executables. No dynamic linking. In fact patches specifically disable
> > calling interpreter. This does not prevent against somebody using dlopen()
> > sutff. So don't sign binaries which do that.
> How dynamic linking and interpreter are related together?

Well interpreter will do the dynamic linking automatically? So I blocked

> This is rather policy than enforcement.
> Protection works only for statically linked binaries, because dynamic
> libraries are not verified.



 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-17 19:01    [W:0.166 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site