[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: BUG at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:921
17.01.2013 17:03, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:05:51AM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> 17.01.2013 02:51, Mark Lord пишет:
>>> On 13-01-16 12:20 AM, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>>>> Mark, could you provide any call traces?
>>> Call traces from where/what?
>>> There's this one, posted earlier in the BUG report:
>>> kernel BUG at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:921!
>>> Call Trace:
>>> [<ffffffffa016a56a>] ? svc_recv+0xcc/0x338 [sunrpc]
>>> [<ffffffffa0318bfc>] ? nfs_callback_authenticate+0x20/0x20 [nfsv4]
>>> [<ffffffffa0318c19>] ? nfs4_callback_svc+0x1d/0x3c [nfsv4]
>>> [<ffffffff810407e6>] ? kthread+0x81/0x89
>>> [<ffffffff81040765>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x36/0x36
>>> [<ffffffff812ea62c>] ? ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
>>> [<ffffffff81040765>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x36/0x36
>> Thanks!
>> I haven't seen the bug report.
>> Could you provide the link, please?
> There's no bz if that's what you're asking for.
> See the first message in the thread for the original report:

Thanks, Bruce.
This looks like the old issue I was trying to fix with "SUNRPC: protect service sockets lists during per-net shutdown".
So, here is the problem as I see it: there is a transport, which is processed by service thread and it's processing is racing with per-net service shutdown:

CPU#0: CPU#1:

svc_recv svc_close_net
svc_get_next_xprt (list_del_init(xpt_ready))
svc_close_list (set XPT_BUSY and XPT_CLOSE)
svc_clear_pools(xprt was gained on CPU#0 already)
svc_delete_xprt (set XPT_DEAD)
svc_handle_xprt (is XPT_CLOSE => svc_delete_xprt()

So, from my POW, we need some way to:
1) Skip such in-progress transports on svc_close_net() call (there is not way to detect them, or at least I don't see one)
2) Delete the transport after somewhere after svc_xprt_received()

But there is a problem with svc_xprt_received(): there is a call for svc_xprt_put() in it (svc_recv->svc_handle_xprt->svc_xprt_received->svc_xprt_put) . And if
we are the only user - then the transport will be destroyed. But transport is dereferenced later in svc_recv() after the svc_handle_xprt call.

What do you think, Bruce?

> --b.

Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-17 15:03    [W:1.230 / U:2.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site