lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [[PATCH v2]] OMAP: omap4-panda: add WiLink shared transport power functions
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:05:10PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:55:14AM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > On 01/17/2013 10:34 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > >> I just wonder how this is going to work with DT... You are not going to have
> > >> the ability to use callback in this form.
> > >> I think the GPIO handling should be done in the driver itself rather than in
> > >> the board file.
> > >
> > > that can (should ?) be moved to ti-st eventually. In fact I don't know
> > > why it was removed in the first place, we would need Pavan to help us
> > > with that query.
> >
> > Yes, this is a good question. I don't know what is the spacial thing platforms
> > need to do in the callback..

hah! looks like I found the reason:

http://git.omapzoom.org/?p=kernel/omap.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-44xx-54xx-connectivity.c;h=e4852b93e91b6daa8f85cca91a1e7fbcc778f45b;hb=594aedd9e7da0491523411f8999efd98297f4fe4#l177

IMHO:

a) removing gpio handling wasn't necessary, we could just check
if gpio_is_valid(nshutdown_gpio)

b) that whole omap_serial_ext_uart_enable() looks really hacky. I'm sure
we can come up with something better.

--
balbi
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-17 12:01    [W:0.066 / U:1.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site