[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Redefinition of struct in6_addr in <netinet/in.h> and <linux/in6.h>
On Wednesday 16 January 2013 13:59:59 David Miller wrote:
> From: Mike Frysinger <>
> > if you're not calling the kernel directly, why are you including the
> > kernel headers ? what is the problem people are actually trying to
> > address here (and no, "i want to include both headers" is not the
> > answer) ?
> When GLIBC doesn't provide it's own definition of some networking
> macros or interfaces that the kernel provides, people include the
> kernel header.

sounds like glibc's headers are out of date and we should update them to
include the missing definitions

but this is still too vague. what headers/definitions do people want to see
simultaneously included ? changes would be needed on both sides (kernel & C

> This has been done for decades, wake up.

and it's been broken for just as long. no need to be a dick.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-16 21:02    [W:0.065 / U:2.828 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site