lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Use of memmap= to forcibly recover memory in 3GB-4GB range - is this safe?
From
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso
<a_villacis@palosanto.com> wrote:
> [ 0.000000] e820: BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f3ff] usable
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f400-0x000000000009ffff]
> reserved
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000f0000-0x00000000000fffff]
> reserved
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x00000000cf58ffff] usable
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000cf590000-0x00000000cf5e2fff] ACPI
> NVS
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000cf5e3000-0x00000000cf5effff] ACPI
> data
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000cf5f0000-0x00000000cf5fffff]
> reserved
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000e0000000-0x00000000efffffff]
> reserved
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec00000-0x00000000ffffffff]
> reserved
> [ 0.000000] NX (Execute Disable) protection: active
..
> [ 0.000000] original variable MTRRs
> [ 0.000000] reg 0, base: 4GB, range: 512MB, type WB
> [ 0.000000] reg 1, base: 4608MB, range: 256MB, type WB
> [ 0.000000] reg 2, base: 0GB, range: 2GB, type WB
> [ 0.000000] reg 3, base: 2GB, range: 1GB, type WB
> [ 0.000000] reg 4, base: 3GB, range: 256MB, type WB
> [ 0.000000] reg 5, base: 3319MB, range: 1MB, type UC
> [ 0.000000] reg 6, base: 3320MB, range: 8MB, type UC
> [ 0.000000] reg 7, base: 3318MB, range: 1MB, type UC
> [ 0.000000] total RAM covered: 4086M

Can you apply attached debug patch to see if the raw e820 is right from BIOS ?

Yinghai
[unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-16 09:01    [W:0.061 / U:0.708 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site