Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 Jan 2013 08:50:16 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: [3.8-{rc1,rc2}] ata1.00: failed to get Identify Device Data, Emask 0x1 |
| |
On 01/16/2013 05:10 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Huang, Shane <Shane.Huang@amd.com> wrote: >>> OK, I see the patch I mentioned to fix the problem was later reverted [1]. >>> The real fix is "libata: replace sata_settings with devslp_timing" [2]. >> >> Yes, please use [2] which can also be found in kernel bugzilla #51881 >> and is pending on Jeff's acceptance. Sorry for the trouble to you guys. >> > > [ CCing Linus ] > > Thanks for taking care (my latest experiences on LKML/linux-next tell > me even this is no more the fact!)! > > Your patch finally hit Linux-Next (next-20130116) and IIRC it is also > marked for previous Linux-kernel releases (CC -stable). > I have tested your patch as said also against Linux v3.8-rcX. > > Unfortunately, the applied patch in Linux-Next does not contain any of > my desired Reported-by/Tested-by. > This makes me a bit unhappy, but I do NOT insist on it. > > Mr. Torvalds himself pointed several times to all maintainers to > honour people - even they report and ideally report-and-test! > > I am doing all my testings in my free-time and I am not paid for it. > I am raping my hardware here! > I can't do more than that!
We definitely appreciate that. The patch in question actually went into the git repository before your report was received. You did not see it in linux-next until my local git repository was pushed out to kernel.org (and thus automatically included in linux-next).
Jeff
| |