lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 05/22] sched: remove domain iterations in fork/exec/wake
On 01/14/2013 04:55 PM, li guang wrote:
>>>>>> > > >> > - /* while loop will break here if sd == NULL */
>>>> > > > I agree that this should be a major optimization. I just can't figure
>>>> > > > out why the existing recursive search for an idle cpu switches to the
>>>> > > > new cpu near the end and then starts a search for an idle cpu in the new
>>>> > > > cpu's domain. Is this to handle some exotic sched domain configurations?
>>>> > > > If so, they probably wouldn't work with your optimizations.
>>> > >
>>> > > I did not find odd configuration that asking for old logical.
>>> > >
>>> > > According to Documentation/scheduler/sched-domains.txt, Maybe never.
>>> > > "A domain's span MUST be a superset of it child's span (this restriction
>>> > > could be relaxed if the need arises), and a base domain for CPU i MUST
>>> > > span at least i." etc. etc.
>> >
>> > The reason for my suspicion is the SD_OVERLAP flag, which has something
>> > to do overlapping sched domains. I haven't looked into what it does or
>> > how it works. I'm just wondering if this optimization will affect the
>> > use of that flag.
> seems it did, SD_OVERLAP will not work after this change,
> though this flag is maybe scarcely used.
> because, this optimization assume all sched-domains span
> is super-set over child domain.
> isn't it? Alex.
>

As my understanding, overlap just said some cpu may appears in 2 or more
same level sub domains. If so, this change won't miss cpus.

Am I right, Peter?

--
Thanks Alex


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-14 11:01    [W:0.014 / U:1.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site