lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Linux-c6x-dev] [PATCH 3/9] c6x: Provide dma_mmap_coherent() and dma_get_sgtable()
From
Date
On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 11:44 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> c6x/allmodconfig (assumed):
>
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c: In function ‘vb2_dc_mmap’:
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c:204: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dma_mmap_coherent’
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c: In function ‘vb2_dc_get_base_sgt’:
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c:387: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dma_get_sgtable’
>
> For architectures using dma_map_ops, dma_mmap_coherent() and
> dma_get_sgtable() are provided in <asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h>.
>
> C6x does not use dma_map_ops, hence it should implement them as inline
> stubs using dma_common_mmap() and dma_common_get_sgtable().
>

So are dma_mmap_coherent() and dma_get_sgtable() part of the DMA API
now? I don't them in Documentation/DMA*.txt anywhere.

Why does the default dma_common_mmap() for !CONFIG_MMU return an
error?

Wouldn't it be better to provide default implementations that an arch
could override rather than having to patch all "no dma_map_ops"
architectures?

--Mark


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-14 17:21    [W:1.089 / U:0.768 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site