Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:45:54 +0800 | From | Chen Gang F T <> | Subject | Re: Why is the kfree() argument const? |
| |
于 2013年01月14日 01:41, Guenter Roeck 写道: > Maybe the confusion arises from the somewhat lax use of the term "const > pointer", and the csomewhat confusing way of defining variable attributes in C. > Strictly speaking, > const char *name; > which is identical to > char const *name; > is not a const pointer, it is a pointer to a constant (string in this case). > A "const pointer", or "constant pointer to an object", would be > char * const name;
Maybe.
:-)
-- Chen Gang
Flying Transformer begin:vcard fn:Chen Gang n:;Chen Gang version:2.1 end:vcard
| |