Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] Cpufreq Fixes for 3.9 | Date | Sat, 12 Jan 2013 14:27:25 +0100 |
| |
On Saturday, January 12, 2013 10:44:37 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > As requested, i am resending all my cpufreq fixes together. I have added correct > Tested-by flags.
I have dropped the previous versions and applied this series instead.
There's no need to add a Tested-by for yourself if you sign-off a patch, though. Tested-by is information that somebody *in* *addition* to the original author has tested the patch, because we all should test the patches we sign-off, right?
Rafael
> Viresh Kumar (5): > cpufreq: Manage only online cpus > cpufreq: Notify governors when cpus are hot-[un]plugged > cpufreq: Don't use cpu removed during cpufreq_driver_unregister > cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev() > cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev() > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 316 +++++++++++++++++----------------------- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 27 +++- > drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 9 ++ > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 14 +- > 4 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-) > > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
| |