[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: USB autosuspend vs. URB submission
On Thursday 10 January 2013 10:20:42 Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Oliver Neukum wrote:

> > In the long run it is probably a good idea to pass duplicated URBs to usbmon by
> > a special code path.
> I'd prefer to add extra information to the WARN_ONCE message. Even
> though it would require the extra effort of correlating the dmesg
> output with the usbmon output.

A stack_trace() I presume.
But what is the use of needing two logs?

> You know, it's possible that the URB really was not submitted before
> but instead the urb->hcpriv field got overwritten. Of course, that
> would also be a bug.

We could log a corrupted URB generically speaking.


 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-10 17:21    [W:0.061 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site