lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: mtd: kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/pat.c:279!
On 09/09/2012 12:04 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 09:56 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>>> So it should either be start=0xfffffffffffff000 end=0xffffffffffffffff
>>> or it should be start=0xfffffffffffff000 len=0x1000.
>>
>> I would strongly object to the former; that kind of inclusive ranges
>> breed a whole class of bugs by themselves.
>
> Another alternative that avoids overflow issues is to use a PFN rather
> than a byte address.
>

Except as a result of that logic have a bunch of places which either
have rounding errors in how they calculate PFNs, or they think they can
stick PFNs into 32-bit numbers. :(

-hpa

--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-09 23:21    [W:0.084 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site