lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] clk: Provide option for clk_get_rate to issue hw for new rate
From
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 7 September 2012 10:21, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Turquette, Mike <mturquette@ti.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@ti.com> wrote:
>>>> I'll take this series into clk-next.
>>>
>>> Oops, I forgot to ask about patch #3. Which tree do you want that to
>>> go through?
>>
>> Just take it all through your tree if there are no major conflicts.
>> Acked-by etc.
>
> Agree, it makes it simpler to go through Mike's clock tree. At least
> let's try it out.
> I will likely have similar patch series with cross dependencies later
> on, so this can be a good first test and hopefully it works.

That will probably hit the next merge window anyway - these
patches will go into v3.7 as it looks, then you can finalize the
next series for v3.8.

> Although, don't we need an ack by Samuel Ortiz for the patch on mfd?
> "mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock"

Confused, isn't that patch part of the latter series, and not
part of what Mike merged?

> Or, is it enough with Linus ack since he is the maintainer of that
> specific mfd file I have patched?

That's up to Mike, but I hardly think Sam is going to get very
angry about this if we merge it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-08 00:01    [W:0.048 / U:2.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site