Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Sep 2012 23:34:01 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: Provide option for clk_get_rate to issue hw for new rate | From | Linus Walleij <> |
| |
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote: > On 7 September 2012 10:21, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Turquette, Mike <mturquette@ti.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@ti.com> wrote: >>>> I'll take this series into clk-next. >>> >>> Oops, I forgot to ask about patch #3. Which tree do you want that to >>> go through? >> >> Just take it all through your tree if there are no major conflicts. >> Acked-by etc. > > Agree, it makes it simpler to go through Mike's clock tree. At least > let's try it out. > I will likely have similar patch series with cross dependencies later > on, so this can be a good first test and hopefully it works.
That will probably hit the next merge window anyway - these patches will go into v3.7 as it looks, then you can finalize the next series for v3.8.
> Although, don't we need an ack by Samuel Ortiz for the patch on mfd? > "mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock"
Confused, isn't that patch part of the latter series, and not part of what Mike merged?
> Or, is it enough with Linus ack since he is the maintainer of that > specific mfd file I have patched?
That's up to Mike, but I hardly think Sam is going to get very angry about this if we merge it.
Yours, Linus Walleij
| |