lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] dev_<level> and dynamic_debug cleanups
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:13:59AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 09:48:12PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > >> The recent commit to fix dynamic_debug was a bit unclean.
> > >> Neaten the style for dynamic_debug.
> > >> Reduce the stack use of message logging that uses netdev_printk
> > >> Add utility functions dev_printk_emit and dev_vprintk_emit for /dev/kmsg.
> > >>
> > >> Joe Perches (5):
> > >> dev_dbg/dynamic_debug: Update to use printk_emit, optimize stack
> > >> netdev_printk/dynamic_netdev_dbg: Directly call printk_emit
> > >> netdev_printk/netif_printk: Remove a superfluous logging colon
> > >> dev: Add dev_vprintk_emit and dev_printk_emit
> > >> device and dynamic_debug: Use dev_vprintk_emit and dev_printk_emit
> > >>
> > >
> > > Ive tested this on 2 builds differing only by DYNAMIC_DEBUG
> > > It works for me on x86-64
> > >
> > > However, I just booted a non-dyndbg build on x86-32, and got this.
> > >
> >
> > Ok, transient error, went away with a clean build.
> >
> > tested-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
>
> Jason, any ACK on these, or any of the other random dynamic debug
> patches floating around? What am I supposed to be applying here?
>

Hi Greg,

I just posted some follow up comments to Joe, so let's see where that
discussion goes.

Thanks,

-Jason


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-06 20:42    [W:0.087 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site