lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ALSA: use list_move_tail instead of list_del/list_add_tail
At Wed, 5 Sep 2012 15:00:15 +0800,
Wei Yongjun wrote:
>
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>
> Using list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail().
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>

Applied this one, too. Thanks.


Takashi


> ---
> sound/pci/emu10k1/memory.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/pci/emu10k1/memory.c b/sound/pci/emu10k1/memory.c
> index 0a43662..1dce0a39 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/memory.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/memory.c
> @@ -263,8 +263,8 @@ int snd_emu10k1_memblk_map(struct snd_emu10k1 *emu, struct snd_emu10k1_memblk *b
> spin_lock_irqsave(&emu->memblk_lock, flags);
> if (blk->mapped_page >= 0) {
> /* update order link */
> - list_del(&blk->mapped_order_link);
> - list_add_tail(&blk->mapped_order_link, &emu->mapped_order_link_head);
> + list_move_tail(&blk->mapped_order_link,
> + &emu->mapped_order_link_head);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&emu->memblk_lock, flags);
> return 0;
> }
>
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-05 10:23    [W:0.065 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site