Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Sep 2012 02:22:22 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH -next] soc: fix wm0010.c printk format warning | From | Sedat Dilek <> |
| |
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote: > On 09/05/2012 05:06 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 04:24:57PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> >>> >>> Fix printk format warning: >> >> Somone already sent this. As ever please try to use subject lines >> appropriate for the subsystem. Please also consider who you're CCing - > > > Unfortunately the MAINTAINERS file does not tell me what to include > in the $subject line for the subsystem. > What would you like to see there, please? Maybe ASoC? >
git log --oneline sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c
Label looks like "ASoC: wm0010:"... (ASoC kills my shift key, I would like to see all labels lower-case).
>> there's no need to copy -next on things like this which aren't > > > I have always done a reply-to-all for linux-next patches, so after > a few years someone days Don't Do That (IYO). >
Then maintainers should check compiler-warnings in their area - regularly?
$ grep warning: v3.6.0-rc4-next20120905-1-iniza-generic/deb-pkg.log | grep 'sound/soc' | wc -l 10
I agree that breakage and regressions should be dealt with higher priority... Such patches like this should be welcome, anyway.
>> integration issues for example, if we start doing that then it'd get >> drowned in noise from all the development. > > > Agreed, many of us are already drowning from 1000+ emails per day. > (seriously) >
Spam will one day eliminate Email, it's perverted.
- Sedat -
> -- > ~Randy > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| |