Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:18:41 -0700 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks |
| |
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:14:48PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:04:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > The following patch has been included in linux-next > > (fe89def79c48e2149abdd1e816523e69a9067191) but has not yet landed in mainline > > nor been queued for stable so far as I can determine. This patch addresses a > > deadlock in mainline and is a prerequisite for an additional fix required by the > > PREEMPT_RT kernel. Can we get this pulled into 3.4.11 please? > > 3.4.11? It has to hit Linus's tree first. > > > Perhaps I am > > jumping the gun, but this patch was originally pulled on June 19, 2012. > > Remember, we missed a pull cycle for tty due to other problems, I > thought I picked all of the different pieces needed for 3.6, but I must > of missed this one.
Nope, it made it, it is commit 2588aba002d14e938c2f56d299ecf3e7ce1302a5.
Now, do you want that patch in the -stable releases? If so, how far back? :)
Sorry for the mess,
greg k-h
| |