Messages in this thread | | | From | KY Srinivasan <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 0/4] Tools: hv | Date | Wed, 5 Sep 2012 19:49:12 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 3:39 PM > To: KY Srinivasan > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; olaf@aepfle.de; > apw@canonical.com; ben@decadent.org.uk; thozza@redhat.com; > dcbw@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Tools: hv > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:24:37PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:01:59AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > > > This patchset was authored by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>. Ben > > > > asked me to submit this patchset. This patchset cleans up the KVP daemon > > > > code and fixes some bugs. > > > > > > > > > > > > K. Y. Srinivasan (4): > > > > tools: hv: Fix file handle leak > > > > tools: hv: Fix exit() error code > > > > tools: hv: Check for read/write errors > > > > tools: hv: Parse /etc/os-release > > > > > > If Ben wrote these, why are you showing that you wrote them? > > > > Ben asked me to apply these patches on the tip (of my tree) and send the > > patches out and that is what I did. I recreated these patches after applying to > > my tree and that is what I have sent out. How could I have made the authorship > > more clear (other than noting so in the comment which I have done). > > You could have actually _kept_ the proper authorship information so that > git shows who wrote the patch. As your shortlog shows above, it looks > like you wrote the patches, not Ben, which is not acceptable.
Obviously, I did not know how I could have done this. I will figure out the correct way of doing this and resubmit these patches.
Thanks,
K. Y
| |