Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:33:28 +0530 | From | Raghavendra K T <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] kvm: Improving undercommit,overcommit scenarios in PLE handler |
| |
On 09/28/2012 11:15 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 09/27/2012 10:38 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> + >> +bool kvm_overcommitted() >> +{ > > This better not be C...
I think you meant I should have had like kvm_overcommitted(void) and (different function name perhaps)
or is it the body of function?
| |