Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:24:42 -0600 | From | Stephen Warren <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: clarify idle vs sleep states |
| |
On 09/28/2012 01:18 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > This pure documentation fix tries to align the "idle" and > "sleep" pin states to the idle and suspend states from > runtime PM. > > Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > --- > ChangeLog v1->v2: > - I changed my mind slightly after experimentation in practice > (empirical stuff is the best). So now I think "idle" is for > runtime_suspend(), and "sleep" is for suspend() proper. This > works best in practice for us. I'm trying to set some model > here that will be easy to understand and usable for typical > cases.
Yes, I think this makes sense.
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
| |