Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:28:29 +0000 | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] make GFP_NOTRACK flag unconditional |
| |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
> There was a general sentiment in a recent discussion (See > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/18/258) that the __GFP flags should be > defined unconditionally. Currently, the only offender is GFP_NOTRACK, > which is conditional to KMEMCHECK. > > This simple patch makes it unconditional.
__GFP_NOTRACK is only used in context where CONFIG_KMEMCHECK is defined?
If that is not the case then you need to define GFP_NOTRACK and substitute it where necessary.
| |