lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lru_lock as late as possible
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:51:05AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 04:05:17PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Mel,
> >
> > I have a question below.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:46:19AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > Compactions migrate scanner acquires the zone->lru_lock when scanning a range
> > > of pages looking for LRU pages to acquire. It does this even if there are
> > > no LRU pages in the range. If multiple processes are compacting then this
> > > can cause severe locking contention. To make matters worse commit b2eef8c0
> > > (mm: compaction: minimise the time IRQs are disabled while isolating pages
> > > for migration) releases the lru_lock every SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages that are
> > > scanned.
> > >
> > > This patch makes two changes to how the migrate scanner acquires the LRU
> > > lock. First, it only releases the LRU lock every SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages if
> > > the lock is contended. This reduces the number of times it unnecessarily
> > > disables and re-enables IRQs. The second is that it defers acquiring the
> > > LRU lock for as long as possible. If there are no LRU pages or the only
> > > LRU pages are transhuge then the LRU lock will not be acquired at all
> > > which reduces contention on zone->lru_lock.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> > > Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > mm/compaction.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> > > index 6b55491..a6068ff 100644
> > > --- a/mm/compaction.c
> > > +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> > > @@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ static inline bool migrate_async_suitable(int migratetype)
> > > return is_migrate_cma(migratetype) || migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static inline bool should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
> > > +{
> > > + return need_resched() || spin_is_contended(lock);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * Compaction requires the taking of some coarse locks that are potentially
> > > * very heavily contended. Check if the process needs to be scheduled or
> > > @@ -62,7 +67,7 @@ static inline bool migrate_async_suitable(int migratetype)
> > > static bool compact_checklock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
> > > bool locked, struct compact_control *cc)
> > > {
> > > - if (need_resched() || spin_is_contended(lock)) {
> > > + if (should_release_lock(lock)) {
> > > if (locked) {
> > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, *flags);
> > > locked = false;
> > > @@ -327,7 +332,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> > > isolate_mode_t mode = 0;
> > > struct lruvec *lruvec;
> > > unsigned long flags;
> > > - bool locked;
> > > + bool locked = false;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Ensure that there are not too many pages isolated from the LRU
> > > @@ -347,23 +352,17 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> > >
> > > /* Time to isolate some pages for migration */
> > > cond_resched();
> > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> > > - locked = true;
> > > for (; low_pfn < end_pfn; low_pfn++) {
> > > struct page *page;
> > >
> > > /* give a chance to irqs before checking need_resched() */
> > > - if (!((low_pfn+1) % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
> > > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> > > - locked = false;
> > > + if (locked && !((low_pfn+1) % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
> > > + if (should_release_lock(&zone->lru_lock)) {
> > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> > > + locked = false;
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > - /* Check if it is ok to still hold the lock */
> > > - locked = compact_checklock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, &flags,
> > > - locked, cc);
> > > - if (!locked || fatal_signal_pending(current))
> > > - break;
> > > -
> > > /*
> > > * migrate_pfn does not necessarily start aligned to a
> > > * pageblock. Ensure that pfn_valid is called when moving
> > > @@ -403,21 +402,38 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> > > pageblock_nr = low_pfn >> pageblock_order;
> > > if (!cc->sync && last_pageblock_nr != pageblock_nr &&
> > > !migrate_async_suitable(get_pageblock_migratetype(page))) {
> > > - low_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages;
> > > - low_pfn = ALIGN(low_pfn, pageblock_nr_pages) - 1;
> > > - last_pageblock_nr = pageblock_nr;
> > > - continue;
> > > + goto next_pageblock;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + /* Check may be lockless but that's ok as we recheck later */
> > > if (!PageLRU(page))
> > > continue;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > - * PageLRU is set, and lru_lock excludes isolation,
> > > - * splitting and collapsing (collapsing has already
> > > - * happened if PageLRU is set).
> > > + * PageLRU is set. lru_lock normally excludes isolation
> > > + * splitting and collapsing (collapsing has already happened
> > > + * if PageLRU is set) but the lock is not necessarily taken
> > > + * here and it is wasteful to take it just to check transhuge.
> > > + * Check transhuge without lock and skip if it's either a
> > > + * transhuge or hugetlbfs page.
> > > */
> > > if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> > > + if (!locked)
> > > + goto next_pageblock;
> >
> > Why skip all pages in a pageblock if !locked?
> > Shouldn't we add some comment?
> >
>
> The comment is above the block already. The lru_lock normally excludes
> isolation and splitting. If we do not hold the hold, it's not safe to
> call compound_order so instead we skip the entire pageblock.

I see. To me, your saying is better than current comment.
I hope comment could be more explicit.

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index df01b4e..f1d2cc7 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -542,8 +542,9 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
* splitting and collapsing (collapsing has already happened
* if PageLRU is set) but the lock is not necessarily taken
* here and it is wasteful to take it just to check transhuge.
- * Check transhuge without lock and skip if it's either a
- * transhuge or hugetlbfs page.
+ * Check transhuge without lock and *skip* if it's either a
+ * transhuge or hugetlbfs page because it's not safe to call
+ * compound_order.
*/
if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
if (!locked)

Anyway, it's trivial and if anyone think it's valuable, feel free to apply it, please.

>
> --
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-25 10:41    [W:0.075 / U:1.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site