Messages in this thread | | | From | "Ren, Cloud" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH] net: add new QCA alx ethernet driver | Date | Thu, 9 Aug 2012 06:49:25 +0000 |
| |
>-----Original Message----- >From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net] >Sent: 2012年8月9日 14:18 >To: Ren, Cloud >Cc: joe@perches.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >qca-linux-team; nic-devel; Huang, Xiong; hao-ran.liu@canonical.com; Rodriguez, >Luis >Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: add new QCA alx ethernet driver > >From: "Ren, Cloud" <cjren@qca.qualcomm.com> >Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 04:44:08 +0000 > >> I only want to do some additional explanations to david. It makes nothing with >original patch. > >Stop this TOP POSTING, it's bad etiquette on a technical mailing list. > >Look at how other people write their email responses on this mailing list. They >first provide a quoted portion of what they are replying >to: > >> Quoted >> something like this. > >And then they provide their response UNDERNEATH. > >When you provide your response at the top of the email, it is unexpected, and >makes more work for people reading what you write. > >You guys are doing everything possibly wrong. > >You have unnecessarily quoted a HUGE patch just to provide some ancillary in >formation. > >You are TOP POSTING. > >You added a signoff of someone who did not give you explicit permission to do >so. > >And you seem to not comprehend nor care about the implications or effects of >your actions that are hurting other people and creating a huge brudon. > >I very much intend to simply ignore your work completely until you can get your >act in gear, write proper emails, and submit patches properly. > >It is the only deterrant I have for your incredibly rude and inconsiderate >behavior.
Hi David,
Please calm down. I will follow rule of sending email from now on. Sorry for causing your trouble. Luis has ever asked joe for adding as a Signed-off-by. At that time joe agreed with it. If joe prefers his name not be listed as a Signed-off-by, I will respect his decision. alx driver is innocent. Please help review. Thanks
cloud
| |