Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 Aug 2012 20:15:49 +0200 | From | Uwe Kleine-König <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] regulator: suppress printk if there is no real info |
| |
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 07:10:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:18:40AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > probably this really only applies to the dummy regulator. If not it > > might be more sensible to do: > > > if (!buf[0]) > > buf = "no parameters"; > > Yeah, having the log message for other regulators is helpful since > things often go boom after you mess with power but not so useful for > dummy. That's a +1 for which approach?
> > or similar. Other than that I wonder if setting the devicename from > > "dummy" to say "regulator-dummy" would be an improvement, too. > > That'd work too. I'd like to combine it with one of the two suggested above. If you answer my question I can follow up with a patch.
Best regards Uwe
-- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |