lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: rcu stalls seen with numasched_v2 patches applied.
From
Date
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 18:03 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw this while I was running the 2nd August -tip kernel + Peter's
> numasched patches.
>
> Top showed load average to be 240, there was one cpu (cpu 7) which
> showed 100% while all other cpus were idle. The system showed some
> sluggishness. Before I saw this I ran Andrea's autonuma benchmark couple
> of times.
>
> I am not sure if this is an already reported issue/known issue.
>
> INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 7} (t=105182911 jiffies)
> Pid: 5173, comm: qpidd Tainted: G W 3.5.0numasched_v2_020812+ #1
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ> [<ffffffff810d4c7e>] rcu_check_callbacks+0x18e/0x650
> [<ffffffff81060918>] update_process_times+0x48/0x90
> [<ffffffff810a2a7e>] tick_sched_timer+0x6e/0xe0
> [<ffffffff810789a5>] __run_hrtimer+0x75/0x1a0
> [<ffffffff810a2a10>] ? tick_setup_sched_timer+0x100/0x100
> [<ffffffff810591cf>] ? __do_softirq+0x13f/0x240
> [<ffffffff81078d56>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xf6/0x240
> [<ffffffff814f0179>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x69/0x99
> [<ffffffff814ef14a>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x70
> <EOI> [<ffffffff814e64b2>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x12/0x20
> [<ffffffff81082552>] sched_setnode+0x82/0xf0
> [<ffffffff8108bd38>] task_numa_work+0x1e8/0x240
> [<ffffffff81070c6c>] task_work_run+0x6c/0x80
> [<ffffffff81013984>] do_notify_resume+0x94/0xa0
> [<ffffffff814e6a6c>] retint_signal+0x48/0x8c

I haven't seen anything like that (obviously), but the one thing you can
try is undo the optimization Oleg suggested and use a separate
callback_head for the task_work and not reuse task_struct::rcu.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-07 16:21    [W:0.211 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site