Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Aug 2012 14:20:14 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] rbtree: low level optimizations in rb_erase() | From | Michel Lespinasse <> |
| |
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 13:50 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 15:34 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote: >> >> + /* Case 3: node's successor is leftmost under its >> >> + * right child subtree >> > >> > Hmm? >> >> Would 'leftmost under node's right child subtree' make more sense ? > > Nah, its the comment style discrepancy.. > > /* > * Case 3: ....
Gah, failed to notice that. Sending new patch (just the comment changed) as a reply.
-- Michel "Walken" Lespinasse A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
| |