Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:24:10 +0200 | From | Michal Hocko <> | Subject | Re: [patch v2] hugetlb: correct page offset index for sharing pmd |
| |
On Sat 04-08-12 14:08:31, Hillf Danton wrote: > The computation of page offset index is incorrect to be used in scanning > prio tree, as huge page offset is required, and is fixed with well > defined routine. > > Changes from v1 > o s/linear_page_index/linear_hugepage_index/ for clearer code > o hp_idx variable added for less change > > > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> > --- > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c Fri Aug 3 20:34:58 2012 > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c Fri Aug 3 20:40:16 2012 > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static void huge_pmd_share(struct mm_str > { > struct vm_area_struct *vma = find_vma(mm, addr); > struct address_space *mapping = vma->vm_file->f_mapping; > + pgoff_t hp_idx; > pgoff_t idx = ((addr - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + > vma->vm_pgoff;
So we have two indexes now. That is just plain ugly!
> struct prio_tree_iter iter; > @@ -72,8 +73,10 @@ static void huge_pmd_share(struct mm_str > if (!vma_shareable(vma, addr)) > return; > > + hp_idx = linear_hugepage_index(vma, addr); > + > mutex_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex); > - vma_prio_tree_foreach(svma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, idx, idx) { > + vma_prio_tree_foreach(svma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, hp_idx, hp_idx) { > if (svma == vma) > continue; > > --
-- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
| |