Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 4 Aug 2012 21:19:17 +0200 | Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the arm-current tree | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
Hi Al,
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 01:47:59PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:52:04AM +0100, Russell King wrote: >> >> Will has concerns with Al's proposed fixes for the signal handling. >> > >> > Could you please resend whatever concerns those had been my way? >> > The last I've seen from Will had been about the stuff in mainline, >> > not in -next; I might have missed something quite easily, though - >> > net.access had been really lousy lately and piles in l-k mbox... ouch. >> >> Speaking about -next, there's still this fix for an avr32 regression: > > Yeah, grabbed it. Will be in the next rebase (hopefully in a few hours).
Still not there, though.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |